Where is your constraint?
Start with the five-minute grid, then score each of the 24 statements from 0 to 4. This is a directional baseline, not a scientific benchmark. The purpose is to identify where the next hour, or the next quarter's budget, is more likely to matter. Each statement is tagged with the reader it checks: peoplemarketmachine
Four questions. Three readers. Green, amber or red.
Score each cell. The grid shows the constraint twice: which letter, and for whom. Then run the full 24 statements below to confirm it.
| The question | People | Markets | Machines |
|---|---|---|---|
| M Could a customer describe us in our sentence? | |||
| A Who else says we’re good, and can a buyer try it? | |||
| P Are we on every channel our buyers use, often enough to be remembered? | |||
| S Can every surface be read, and is it one source of truth? |
Click a cell to score it. Stored only in this browser.
The total score matters less than the shape.
If this is weak, define ICPs, needs, message architecture, prompt universe and relationships before spending on distribution.
If this is weak, map where each ICP looks and the sources systems consult, then close the gaps that matter.
If this is weak, remove the friction between the proof you already have and the people and machines that need to use it.
That is the second constraint. A brand strong for machines and weak for people has an AI-visibility program, not a marketing one. A brand strong for people and weak for machines is invisible to the systems that now answer on its behalf.
Need a deeper MAPS audit?
The full version adds prompt baselines, competitor source and channel analysis, entity and fact reconciliation, a surface inventory and an implementation backlog.